Synsets for "implicit"

Synset: implicit.a.01

Synonyms: implicit

Part of Speech: ADJECTIVE

Definition: implied though not directly expressed; inherent in the nature of something

Examples: an implicit agreement not to raise the subject | there was implicit criticism in his voice | anger was implicit in the argument | the oak is implicit in the acorn

Lemmas: implicit inexplicit

Hypernym:

Hyponym:

Antonyms: explicit

    

Synset: implicit.s.02

Synonyms: implicit

Part of Speech: ADJECTIVE SATELLITE

Definition: being without doubt or reserve

Examples: implicit trust

Lemmas: implicit unquestioning

Hypernym:

Hyponym:

Antonyms:

    

Related Wikipedia Samples:

Article Related Text
Implicit function The implicit function theorem provides conditions under which a relation defines an implicit function.
Implicit surface A further simple method to generate new implicit surfaces is called "metamorphoses" of implicit surfaces:
Implicit stereotype An implicit stereotype is the unconscious attribution of particular qualities to a member of a certain social group. Implicit stereotypes are influenced by experience, and are based on learned associations between various qualities and social categories, including race or gender. Individuals' perceptions and behaviors can be affected by implicit stereotypes, even without the individuals' intention or awareness. Implicit stereotypes are an aspect of implicit social cognition, the phenomenon that perceptions, attitudes, and stereotypes operate without conscious intention. The existence of implicit stereotypes is supported by a variety of scientific articles in psychological literature. Implicit stereotype were first defined by psychologists Anthony Greenwald and Mahzarin Banaji in 1995.
Implicit learning Implicit learning is the learning of complex information in an incidental manner, without awareness of what has been learned. According to Frensch and Rünger (2003) the general definition of implicit learning is still subject to some controversy, although the topic has had some significant developments since the 1960s. Implicit learning may require a certain minimal amount of attention and may depend on attentional and working memory mechanisms. The result of implicit learning is implicit knowledge in the form of abstract (but possibly instantiated) representations rather than verbatim or aggregate representations, and scholars have drawn similarities between implicit learning and implicit memory.
Implicit function Nevertheless, one can still refer to the implicit solution "y" = "g"("x") involving the multi-valued implicit function "g".
Implicit stereotype Implicit Association Tests reveal an implicit association for male with science and math, and females with arts and language.
Implicit self-esteem In the article "Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?", the validity and reliability of seven implicit self-esteem measures have been explored. The implicit measures were not correlated with one another. However they did correlate, but only faintly with measures of explicit self-esteem. The implicit self-esteem measurements confirmed partial reliabilities in correlation to good test-retest reliabilities. Nonetheless implicit measures were limited in their ability to calculate standard variables, for the test. Certain evidence explained that measurements of implicit self-esteem are delicate to put in context, which is further argued in later research of implicit self-esteem.
Implicit attitude Early research by Nuttin et al. (1985) suggested that people generally have an implicit preference for letters in their own name, known as the Name letter effect. Further replications of this same effect with varying independent variables (e.g., attractiveness to people with the same letters contained in their names) suggest that people have an implicit preference towards themselves. This manifestation of implicit attitude has come to be known as Implicit egotism. Implicit egotism additionally manifests itself in in-groups.
Implicit learning The field of implicit learning has been subject to debate due to its methodology. A large portion of the discussion of issues with methodology seem to be in the measurement of implicit learning. Currently, experiments of implicit learning is measured through the retrieval of implicit knowledge because measurements that can accurately test the direct process of implicit learning is undeveloped. It is important to differentiate between measurement of conscious and unconscious processes in order to make valid assessments.
Implicit stereotype Implicit stereotypes cannot be revealed by asking individuals direct questions. This is because individuals may be unaware they hold an implicit stereotype, they may not endorse the stereotype, or they may be unwilling to reveal they endorse the stereotype. Thus, implicit measures are necessary to tap implicit stereotypes.
Implicit learning In implicit learning, transfer of the acquired knowledge is generally weak. Studies show that knowledge gained through implicit learning is only of limited transfer to structurally similar tasks. Whereas some research showed that participants were unable to use implicit learning to complete structurally similar tasks at all, others showed decreased transfer. Implicit knowledge is characterized to be highly inaccessible.
Implicit memory It is debated whether implicit attitudes (that is, attitudes people have without being consciously aware of them) belong under the category of implicit memory or if this merely involves a pragmatic approach to asserting knowledge. In some ways, implicit attitudes resemble procedural memory as they rely on an implicit, unconscious piece of knowledge that was previously learned.
Arthur S. Reber A variety of other techniques have been developed to study implicit cognitive functions and a host of related phenomena have been explored including implicit memory, the Implicit Association Test, the role of implicit acquisition in language learning and socialization and the multi-national, multi-university Project Implicit.
Implicit attitude Based on many empirical findings, Greenwald and Banaji et al. (1995) generated the fundamental idea of implicit attitude definitively for the first time, disambiguating attitude into explicit and implicit types. Halo effects are an example of the empirical research used by Greenwald and Banaji in their chapter on implicit social cognition. Understanding halo effects set the foundation for understanding other theories regarding implicit attitudes. For example, it is possible to explain implicit partisanship or implicit egotism in terms of a halo effect, however these concepts will discussed more in subsequent sections.
Gender role These implicit stereotypes can often be demonstrated by the Implicit-association test (IAT).
Implicit surface An implicit surface is the set of zeros of a function of 3 variables. "Implicit" means, that the equation is not solved for x or y or z.
Implicit surface As in the case of implicit curves it is an easy task to generate implicit surfaces with desired shapes by applying algebraic operations (addition, multiplication) on simple primitives.
Implicit certificate Elliptic Curve Qu-Vanstone (ECQV) are one kind of implicit certificates. This article will use ECQV as a concrete example to illustrate implicit certificates.
Implicit stereotype Implicit stereotypes can, at least temporarily, be reduced or increased. Methods for altering implicit stereotypes fall under the following five categories.
Implicit function 2. An example of an implicit function, for which implicit differentiation is easier than using explicit differentiation, the function "y"("x") defined by the equation